data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3aaa/f3aaa878d410dae8c230c19ae17fcb6765c488b6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93876/93876eb34d34c9ed4c86ea8153558bbe7ecf9ede" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b34/b0b34287b4ae21050213d6f212440c230fad10cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e6d/f5e6d9c67a49ec4bbc693ce45de82ea8391048da" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d390a/d390a907a33627d532fbbdb1b7868fddf46bce4d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d14e/4d14eb6ce62bf5c4227cc3f494a48a30fe9543cb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba7a5/ba7a508821b10e718be4220b27bd24e80f681d76" alt=""
Anyone who has ever tried to scan in a mis-exposed print will share my frustration. There is a side of me that wants things to look pretty much they way the originals do. There is a side of me that wants them to look better. The problem is that, after the programing has tried to correct exposures, I often get neither.
No comments:
Post a Comment